Discovery

Board of Commissioners of the New Orleans Exhibition Authority v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, et al. , No. 94-CC-2604 (La.Sup.Ct., December 19, 1994) (deposing attorneys is disfavored because of unnecesary delays and potential harassment)

Hines v. Consol. Rail Corp., 926 F.2d 262, 272 (3d Cir. 1991) (reversing summary judgment based in part on the district court's failure to "provide [plaintiff] with the opportunity to conduct discovery on [defendant's] expert and consequently the data and techniques that [defendant's] expert used").

Smith v. McNeilab, Inc., 1986 WL 3591 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 17, 1986) (Green, J.) (discovery's relevance is not dependent on admissibility at trial).

Bennett v. McNeilab, Inc., 1985 WL 4014 (E.D.Pa. 1985) (Scirica, J.) (entitlement to broad array of adverse reactions and raw data in drug product case).